PETER BOYLES KHOW RADIO

4695 South Monaco Street
Denver, Colorado 80237

August 17, 2001

Mr. Boyles:

I thought you might be interested in the following letter I sent to The Denver Post.

To The Editor:

The discipline given to a Lakewood Police officer for leaving a message that was interpreted as a threat, The Denver Post, page2B, Friday, August 17, 2001, has sent a very bad message to the rest of us, as well as other police officers.

The Lakewood police officer was sticking his neck out for a woman he believed could be in danger of physical harm. The fact that he left a message he knew was being recorded should be sufficient evidence of a lack of malicious intent on his part.

The article indicates that the officer was punished for "a poor choice of words." Given the choice of words in the threat allegedly made by Richard Lucero after a minor traffic accident involving Ron Norris and his wife, my choice of words would have been on a par with those used by the officer.

If anyone thinks that police officers don't occasionally advise suspects of their rights… in a rather unofficial but generally effective way… in order to head off further bad acts, they've been watching too many Adam-12 reruns and not enough episodes of Adam-12.

I don't mean to minimize the seriousness of this matter, but cops live in a real world of real violence.. As a former investigator for the Denver County and Jefferson County District Attorneys' Offices, I'm not unfamiliar with how much cops will stick out their necks for a potential victim of criminal activity when they need to do so.

Maybe there was no way to avoid an official response to this incident once it was made public by the well-intentioned, but misguided actions of a television reporter, who never may have been closer to violence than the outside of a line of yellow police tape, but the rest of us can only hope that other cops, perhaps using a "better choice of words," will not

Rick Johnson
Rick Johnson & Associates of Colorado, Inc.

All I would add to this is that I found it odd that, your program aside, published news accounts went into much more detail about the officer's actions and words than they did regarding the nature of Mr. Lucero's alleged threat and the actual impact it had on the people at whom it was directed.

Frankly, I also thought it odd that, while the reporter who broke the story on television was on your show, he apparently had nothing at all to say about the specific nature of the alleged threat by Mr. Lucero or the impact it had on Mr. and Mrs. Norris.

Just reading published news accounts, I'd have to conclude that the original alleged threat must have been serious, or the Lakewood officer wouldn't have responded as he did. You would think that these elements of the story would have at least as much importance as was the action taken by the officer and his department.

It used to be that, when one news outlet had a story of some interest, everybody else was out to get what was missed… to "one-up" the competition. Now it seems that, once a story is out, everybody else in the conventional news business just rolls over and reports whatever already was reported.

As a private investigator, I could think of half a dozen avenues of investigation, including whether or not Mr. Lucero has a record, particularly of threats, physical assault, and restraining orders… and whether or not the officer has any other record of discipline.

In this instance, as in many others, half the story is worse than no story at all.

Sincerely,

Rick Johnson
Rick Johnson & Associates of Colorado, Inc.
1649 Downing Street, Denver, CO, 80218
rick@denverpi.com